Author Topic: Ridgeback weights  (Read 2033 times)

Offline George Boateng

  • Ridgeback Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 38
  • Biscuits: 3
Re: Ridgeback weights
« Reply #15 on: July 14, 2010, 09:42 AM »
George, with big dogs it is better to err on the side of being skinny than to have a fat dog as being overweight puts an awful lot of stress and strain on the joints which is something you absolutely want to avoid at all cost.

Caroline

Quite, I totally disagree with people who have overweight dogs. George has been eating 10 cups a day ... yes 10 ... 5 in the morning and 5 on an evening but we've just reduced this to 8 and suspect we'll reduce it further as his growth slows down. Our collie has just reached a point at 18 months where he doesn't want more than 2 cups a day so we have to be careful that George doesn't 'snaffle' his food when he leaves it!

I also measure George today and he's 35 inches to the head and 28" to the shoulder ....

Offline masterhulk

  • Ridgeback Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 24
  • Biscuits: 3
Re: Ridgeback weights
« Reply #16 on: July 16, 2010, 04:55 PM »
hey thanks all for your stories this is exactly what I was after
thanks again guys n girlz

Peter

Offline kaiba

  • Ridgeback Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 36
  • Biscuits: 8
Re: Ridgeback weights
« Reply #17 on: July 19, 2010, 02:38 AM »
My big fella got up to about 47kg and the vet said he was overweight and had to lose a couple of kilos, so I guess for his height he should have been around 45kg.

Offline Chubosco

  • Ridgeback Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 90
  • Biscuits: 12
  • My baby, when a baby!
Re: Ridgeback weights
« Reply #18 on: August 06, 2010, 09:48 PM »
My rr weighs 115 pounds and the vet said it is the ideal weight for him. He is very muscular looking. Everyone comments on seeing him.
John

Offline jacksonpd

  • Ridgeback Novice
  • *
  • Posts: 6
  • Biscuits: 2
Re: Ridgeback weights
« Reply #19 on: August 13, 2010, 03:40 PM »
This topic raises a question that I have about my RR. He just turned 1 yr this week and is weighing in at 90 lbs. He is lean , all muscle and very active. I sent the breeder updated photos the other night and she told me that we should expect him to continue growing for the next year! His dad was well over 120 lbs. So is he just from a line of a larger RR's or is this normal.  We feed him Blue Buffalo (Large Breed) 4 cups a day. 

Offline caro

  • Kennel Manager
  • RAA Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5275
  • Biscuits: 208
Re: Ridgeback weights
« Reply #20 on: August 13, 2010, 04:41 PM »
Those are big dogs!!  One can't really say whether the weights are correct or not because it would depend very much on the height of the dog.  One can only say that 120 lbs is waaay over the standard, but for the height of that dog, it may very well be correct and the dog is just big!  Usually Ridgebacks are finished growing upward by about a year after that it is putting on muscle and filling out, but your breeder knows the line better and the growth of different lines vary a lot.  A rule of thumb is that you should be able to see the shadow of the ribs when they move, but never be able to actually put your fingers between the ribs.  If you can't see the ribs at all, then your dog is too fat.  Hope this helps.

By the way, I used to feed Blue Buffalo but switched a couple of weeks ago because the protein was too high.  I ended up with California Natural Lamb and Rice (21 percent protein) and my puppy is doing great; he gets four cups a day plus a spoon of yogurt and a little cottage cheese a couple of times a week.  I supplement with 1000 mgs of Ester C and some fish oil, plus a multi vitamin.  He's 18 weeks and weighs around 45 lbs.  But he is going to be a tall dog judging by the size of his knuckles, tail and ears!
Caroline

Offline Chubosco

  • Ridgeback Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 90
  • Biscuits: 12
  • My baby, when a baby!
Re: Ridgeback weights
« Reply #21 on: August 13, 2010, 09:43 PM »
I know this is heresy but I would love to see the standard raised. When I see a rr within standard they seem so little.

I think it would be great if breeders bred them up. I have seen some rr's bred for (by?) the Israeli army and they were as large as a Great Danes.

I have to tell you, that is a dog! And they were very much rr's.
John

Offline nana

  • Member of RAA
  • ****
  • Posts: 1024
  • Biscuits: 57
  • ROO-"Butterfly"
    • RRs
Re: Ridgeback weights
« Reply #22 on: August 14, 2010, 05:57 AM »
they were as large as a Great Danes.

I have to tell you, that is a dog! And they were very much rr's.

RRs look as a Great Dane can not be called the Rhodesian Ridgeback. The functional using of Great Danes is NOT the same as RRs. To me, it is a very bad idea to let the RR look as a Gerat Dane. If I would like to have a Great Dane I would have had a Dreat Dane. But I don't want to have a Great Dane - I wont to have a RR. One of my bitches is a very big and heavy girl and she loses A LOT in RR proper moving - no agility, no speed, no beautuful easy movement.. imo.

Nana
....more than the ridge
http://r-ridges.com

Offline caro

  • Kennel Manager
  • RAA Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5275
  • Biscuits: 208
Re: Ridgeback weights
« Reply #23 on: August 14, 2010, 07:29 AM »
As Nana says, the very large Ridgebacks cannot do the job they were supposed to do.  They cannot trott for days on end and have enough "in the tank" to chase down dinner at the end of the day.  They cannot dart and lunge as fast as is needed to keep an animal at bay.  If you want a Great Dane then get a Great Dane, but don't make a Ridgeback into something it was never supposed to be.  I don't know what the Israeli army is doing with the breed, but I do know that Ms. Nevo who is the doyen of the breed in Israel would be horrified at anybody intentionally breeding huge dogs.  Right now the complaint almost universally is that the dogs are getting too big and breeders need to pay attention to avoid producing out of standard dogs.

Caroline

Offline rrbylexus

  • Kennel Manager
  • Potential Ridgeback Addict
  • *****
  • Posts: 465
  • Biscuits: 116
    • Ridgebacks by Lexess
Re: Ridgeback weights
« Reply #24 on: August 14, 2010, 09:43 AM »
So sad to see that some are purposely breeding RRs to be so large...such a disservice to the breed, not to mention the added health issues.  The larger the dog, the lesser the life expectancy.

Reading the posts praising the large dogs makes me wonder if those people even know what the breed was bred to do.  These dogs are NOT supposed to be lion killers, they are supposed to be lion pursuers and harassers.  In order to do the job they were bred to do, they have to be medium sized dogs with great agility and endurance.  A large dog is just a larger and slower target for lions.

We must not forget our breeds' history and function and should only breed with those goals in mind.

Pam
« Last Edit: August 14, 2010, 10:42 AM by rrbylexus »
Pam Mathews
Ridgebacks by Lexess

Offline masterhulk

  • Ridgeback Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 24
  • Biscuits: 3
Re: Ridgeback weights
« Reply #25 on: August 17, 2010, 08:13 AM »
100% agree with Pam
if you want a big dog by a Great Dane  ;D
my $0.02

Peter

Offline Keeper

  • Sandra
  • Kennel Operations Manager
  • RAA Board of Directors
  • *****
  • Posts: 3584
  • Biscuits: 279
    • KISSI RHODESIAN RIDGEBACKS
Re: Ridgeback weights
« Reply #26 on: August 17, 2010, 08:58 PM »
big is not Always better. 
Every breed standard is there for a reason...a guide to keep the dog from changing into something it IS NOT.

I've always strived to breed to the standard, occassionally a larger dog/bitch will occur.  But if you want a larger breed...choose one that fits your desires, not breed a bigger Ridgeback.  Unfortunately there are breeders who choose to breed 'outside the standard'.  That doesn't make it right.

I agree with the reason behind keeping the Ridgebacks within our standard. 
Sandra
"A Ridgeback isn't just another dog...It's a Lifestyle!"
www.kissiridgebacks.com

Do you fan the flames, try to douse them, flee from the heat, watch as the house burns, or use the
cell-phone camera to privately send it to others?
Moderators are unpaid firefighters.

Offline Chubosco

  • Ridgeback Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 90
  • Biscuits: 12
  • My baby, when a baby!
Re: Ridgeback weights
« Reply #27 on: August 17, 2010, 09:19 PM »
Who painted the rr large?

Off with his head! :o
John

Offline Keeper

  • Sandra
  • Kennel Operations Manager
  • RAA Board of Directors
  • *****
  • Posts: 3584
  • Biscuits: 279
    • KISSI RHODESIAN RIDGEBACKS
Re: Ridgeback weights
« Reply #28 on: August 17, 2010, 10:42 PM »
If you compare ridgebacks throughout the world you will see some that are larger than others.
However, nearly every country uses a height and weight standard that is similar. 
Purists and breeders who are members of national clubs try to adhere to the standard of each country. 
 :)
Sandra
"A Ridgeback isn't just another dog...It's a Lifestyle!"
www.kissiridgebacks.com

Do you fan the flames, try to douse them, flee from the heat, watch as the house burns, or use the
cell-phone camera to privately send it to others?
Moderators are unpaid firefighters.

Offline malismum

  • Ridgeback Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 37
  • Biscuits: 7
Re: Ridgeback weights
« Reply #29 on: December 16, 2011, 12:13 PM »
Hi I am just wondering for those of you that  have a female Ridgeback of around 5 to 6 years of age how much does she weigh? My girl will be 6 next February and she weighs around 36 kilos (approx 79 lbs)  She is around 26 inches tall. Last year she was not well so she had to have a visit to the Vet who told me she was a little underweight at 36 kilos. I tried to tell her that according to breed standards for a Ridgeback female that she was about the right weight. Admittedly Mali looks on the lean side. She is long and lean. Now while I think that is ok at her age to be on the lean side I thought that maybe the Vet may be right so I increased the amount I fed her. However whenever I increase the amount I feed her you could be sure that within a day or two she will leave me very soft stools in big messy piles.... sorry.....but when I put her back on what I normally feed her she goes back to firm stools once or twice a day. Easy pick up for me. I have tried the Satin Ball diet giving her 3 balls a day with her food but still no great advantage to her gaining weight. She seems to have a sensitive stomach because when I feed her bones (apart from chicken wings etc)  she throws them up or when she passes them there is blood on her stools so I no longer feed her raw meat bones only chicken wings. I hope you can give me some advice about how you feel she is going compared to your girls. By the way the other day a passerby in car asked me if  she was a Ridgeback crossed with a Greyhound because she is so lean....lol

Ann